In North Carolina, doctors have a legal duty to exercise reasonable care when prescribing medications to their patients. If a doctor’s prescription results in medical complications or harm to the patient, the doctor may be held liable for civil damages under medical malpractice law. Due to the nuanced nature of pharmacology and pathology, medical malpractice cases involving medication errors can be complex and often difficult to prove. However, there are several key factors that can impact the outcome of such cases.
Protect Yourself By Understanding Your Options and Knowing Your Rights
Call For A Consultation 704-333-9900
One important factor to consider is the standard of care that applies to doctors in North Carolina. Medical malpractice law requires doctors to meet a certain standard of care when treating patients, which means that they must act in accordance with accepted medical practices and procedures. Standard of care answers the question, “what is the accepted practice or action that most doctors would do in the same situation?” If a doctor deviates from this standard of care and it results in harm to the patient, the doctor may be held liable for medical malpractice.
Another important factor to consider is the role of informed consent in medication-related medical malpractice cases. In North Carolina, doctors have a legal duty to obtain informed consent from their patients before prescribing medications. This means that doctors must fully disclose the risks and benefits of the medication, as well as any potential side effects or interactions with other medications the patient is taking. If a doctor fails to obtain informed consent and the patient suffers harm as a result, the doctor may be held liable for medical malpractice.
There are also several potential defenses that doctors may raise in medication-related medical malpractice cases. For example, a doctor may argue that the medication was prescribed in accordance with accepted medical practices and procedures, or that the patient’s medical complications were caused by factors outside of the doctor’s control. However, the burden of proof in a medical malpractice case rests with the plaintiff, which means that the patient or their legal representative must demonstrate that the doctor’s prescription was the direct cause of their harm.
Copyright ©2025 Plumides, Romano & Johnson PC • All rights reserved
This website is intended to provide general information only. Nothing contained in this website is intended to provide legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge and agree that you have not formed an attorney-client relationship with Plumides, Romano & Johnson PC and will not rely on any information contained on this website.